Blog

  • Book review: “Honeymooners: A Cautionary Tale” by Chuck Kinder

    book-7121This review first appeared in the Albany Times Union (August 11, 2001)

    Hilarious, loving characters in ‘Honeymooners’

    Chuck Kinder’s first novel since “The Silver Ghost,” in 1978, “Honeymooners: A Cautionary Tale” ($24; Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 358 pages), is a hilarious, yet unflinching, eyes-against-the-windshield journey through years of booze, drugs, sex, friendships, lies and betrayals in the lives of a pair of promising young writers.

    The freewheeling 1970s that Kinder recreates, mostly in the San Francisco Bay area, belong within the literary tradition of the moveable feast Hemingway created out of Paris in the ’20s. Kinder’s writers, Ralph Crawford and Jim Stark, live “like bold outlaw authors on the lam from that gloomy tedium called ordinary life.” Kinder both celebrates and sends up their bravura and recklessness.

    (more…)

  • A new story published by We Love Books & Company

    Thanks to Ray Ortali for publishing my latest short story, Auntie Lovely Says Goodbye, in his eMagazine, We Love Books & Company, which you can download here.

  • Highlights from Art on Paper, a NYC art fair

    Highlights from Art on Paper, a NYC art fair

    For the past few years, the New York City art fairs have become part of my day job. This year, for the first time, I visited Art on Paper.

    Here are some highlights:

    tillinghast1

    Eric Tillinghast, Aegle, 2014, was exhibited among other similar work at the Richard Levy Gallery’s booth. Tillinghast’s work features postcards of swimming pools and other bodies of water in which most of the context has been painted out. Here, for example, a figure that could’ve been reclining poolside now appears to float in a surreal white space, detached from anything familiar.

     

    semmes1

    In a somewhat familiar vein is this piece by Beverly Semmes, shown at the Shoshana Wayne Gallery booth. Here, the decontextualization through paint over a found image is a covering up of a female body that had been in a pornographic magazine. I’m familiar with her work from the Tang Teaching Museum exhibition that included similar painted-over pornographic images. This work is part of a group of work Semmes calls the Feminist Responsibility Project, as if it is her responsibility to cover up these nude women. Though some younger women, Skidmore students, wondered how did Semmes know if these women weren’t being responsible and in control of how their images are being taken and how they are being compensated for them?

    grillo1

    John Grillo’s Untitled Mosaic 5, from 1952, was on view at the David Findlay Jr Gallery booth. This work looked like something from the 1950s, but the mosaic pattern reminded me of the work of Alma Thomas (though her oils feel weightier and more satisfying). I enjoyed the exuberance of it, though that is offset by the watercolor’s delicacy.

    freeman1

    Speaking of exuberance, I really enjoyed this display of Joanne Freeman’s recent work, goache on handmade paper on view at the Kathryn Markel Fine Arts booth. There’s something playful in the geometric shapes, how some crowd the edges of the work, and others open to the paper behind it, as if defining a new kind of alphabet, or a new kind of geometric language.

    DaveEggersAonP

    And then I came to this, by the multitalented author-artist-publisher Dave Eggers, at the Electric Works booth. This work — being exhibited for the first time — was fun and unexpected, playful, silly, and poignant. Plenty more examples of his work can be found here. Dave Eggers being Dave Eggers, the proceeds from the sale of his works were all to go to ScholarMatch, a nonprofit he founded that connects donors with students who need help paying for college.

    Having attended other art fairs before, I really enjoyed Art on Paper — it was smaller than others, so it felt easier to get around and less crowded. Plus the work itself felt smaller, sometimes more intimate, and therefore more accessible.

    Though one of the most memorable shows of work on paper was something that I didn’t see at Art on Paper; rather, it was the work by Casey Ruble on view at the Foley Gallery in the Lower East Side. The work features cut paper that is layered to produce landscapes, cityscapes and interiors.

    theysaidthey1

    Here is “They said they’d rather die here than in Vietnam.”, 2015, which is only 6.5 x 8 inches. This reproduced image of the paper collage doesn’t do justice to the cuts and layering, which are visible upon close inspection of the real thing. That’s one of the things that makes seeing the object in real life so much  more rewarding, and the work so much more powerful.

     

  • Why you should download the massive, free e-book ‘Up and Coming’

    AnthoCover3_400.pngWhat is the future of science fiction?

    It could be in the pages of Up and Coming: Stories by the 2016 Campbell Eligible Authors.

    You can download the book here: http://www.badmenagerie.com/

    Hurry up, though, the download will only be available until March 31, 2016.

    What is a “Campbell Eligible Author” you may ask? These are writers who are new to the science fiction and fantasy field with their first professionally paid publications. The John W. Campbell Award is presented at the World Science Fiction Convention (this year, it will be held in Kansas City, Mo., in August). More info on the awards is available here: http://www.writertopia.com/awards/campbell

    I was happy to see lots of writers that are familiar to me from my reading of shot stories and/or SFF-related blogs, including:

    • Nicolette Barischoff
    • S.B. Divya
    • David J́on Fuller
    • Jaymee Goh
    • LS Johnson
    • Alyssa Wong
    • Jeff Xilon
    • Isabel Yap

    So you could consider this list of writers as a point of entry into this tome. You may find plenty of your gems in it, though.

    Let me know what you find and recommend.

     

  • Submittable and the neurotic writer

    Submittable and the neurotic writer

    As many writers know, there are all sorts of way submissions of stories and poems to journals and magazines get submitted. Few places take postal mail. Lots of places take email. Most, though, take neither and use some kind of online form, such as Submission Manager, or Submittable.

    Screen Shot 2016-02-27 at 12.27.34 PMHere’s the thing about a service like Submittable: You get to see whatever you have out in the world awaiting a judgment in one fell swoop.

    Once a piece of writing has been submitted, the first status you see is “Received.” This status brings  writers a glorious sense of satisfaction, accomplishment and peace — for all of about 10 seconds. Then, as the days, weeks, and months (yes months) crawl by, and that status “Received” keeps saying “Received,” the writer begins to wonder, “Why are they ignoring me?” or “How can they let my work just sit there?” All a writer wants is a chance and some acknowledgment. “Received” comes to mean more than being ignored; it means you don’t have a chance (yet) and you aren’t being acknowledged (yet). “Received” can be very frustrating.

    It should get better when a status changes to “In-Progress.” The first sight of it does produce of frisson of excitement — someone’s reading me! However, that can be quickly replaced with a sense of dread — someone’s reading me!

    That second feeling persists, though, as the status remains “In-Progress.”

    What happens next may not seem fair, or wonderfully fair. If the writing is “Accepted” or “Declined” (or if it is “Withdrawn” by the author) that status doesn’t appear — at least if the writer is looking only at the submissions that are still “active.” Of course,  you could switch tabs and look only at the “Accepted” writing — and if there’s a new one, the one that had just disappeared from the “active” list, then much celebration can ensue. Or you could look at the “Declined” list, and, if the new one is there, instead, I suppose the opposite of much celebration will then ensue.

    No matter what, though, Submittable is supposed to make tracking writing submissions easier — and it removes what in the pre-Internet days was just months of months of not knowing until a SASE returned. Now there are statuses that can appear frozen in place for months and months, and each one can fill a writer with various levels of anxiety and dread.